The Anti-Union South: Railroads and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
-
November 13, 1956 letter from Emanuel Muravchik, National Field Director of the Jewish Labor Committee, to Emory Via, a surveyor sent to North Carolina and South Carolina. Muravchik names "several tales" of racial discrimination by Southern unions for Via to investigate: a "White Citizens Council type group" that took over a Durham local, the exclusion of Black workers from a UTW local, and a Charleston union threatening to leave the AFL-CIO unless it rescinded its integration requirement.
Courtesy of University of Maryland Libraries, AFL-CIO Civil Rights Department records.
-
Questionnaire form filled out by Jewish Labor Committee surveyors speaking to Seafood and Oystermen's Association, Independent.
Courtesy of University of Maryland Libraries, AFL-CIO Civil Rights Department records.
-
Surveyor feedback after speaking with a whites-only plumbers association.
Courtesy of University of Maryland Libraries, AFL-CIO Civil Rights Department records.
-
Surveyor feedback from white Atlanta union workers speaking to their impression of integration's inevitability.
Courtesy of University of Maryland Libraries, AFL-CIO Civil Rights Department records.
-
Article in Atlanta World circa 1956 reporting the contrast between the official AFL-CIO stand against segregation and the South Carolina union leaders attempting to attract racist white workers.
Courtesy of University of Maryland Libraries, AFL-CIO Civil Rights Department records.
-
Text of address by Adell Somersett, VP and National Organizer of United Southern Employees Association, Inc., explaining the organization's segregationist position in response to the Brown v. Board Supreme Court decision.
Courtesy of University of Maryland Libraries, AFL-CIO Civil Rights Department records.
-
October 1956 letters from the president and vice president of Adams-Mills Corporation to workers describing the threat of union organization at their plant. Employers often used threats of integration to keep white workers focused on fighting Black coworkers instead of working conditions.
Courtesy of University of Maryland Libraries, AFL-CIO Civil Rights Department records.
-
December 1962 draft of letter from the AFL-CIO Civil Rights Committee asking its affiliates to name officers who would work on the Union Program for Fair Practices at the outset of the federal EEOC program.
Courtesy of University of Maryland Libraries, AFL-CIO Civil Rights Department records.
-
August 1966 letter from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to the "Gentlemen" of the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company informing them of the commission's determination of "reasonable cause" against the railroad. The EEOC urges the company to settle with the complainants and to "cooperate with us in achieving the objectives of the Civil Rights Act."
Courtesy of University of Maryland Libraries, AFL-CIO Civil Rights Department records.
-
EEOC findings report of March 1966 complaint brought against the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company. The charging parties alleged that the company discriminated against Black employees through job classification. The EEOC investigation found that the Company did not pay Black brakemen as much as whites for "equivalent and interchangeable" work, and subsequently charges the company with violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
Courtesy of University of Maryland Libraries, AFL-CIO Civil Rights Department records.
-
Chart of complaints filed against unions through the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Courtesy of University of Maryland Libraries, AFL-CIO Civil Rights Department records.
Throughout the 1960s, even as the civil rights movement won important victories, segregation remained so common that organizers often found themselves having to work against the AFL-CIO’s policy of nondiscrimination. And for unionized Black workers, many found that official progressive AFL-CIO policy was slow to trickle down. As a result, surveys directed by the Jewish Labor Committee of post-Brown unions in the South reported that many Black workers declared little loyalty to their heavily discriminatory unions. But with the establishment of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in 1965, workplace discrimination became subject to federal oversight, allowing civil rights laws to be enforced. Workers finally had a system to file grievances against their employers and unions without fearing for their jobs. Rail workers’ complaints in particular had hardly changed over the decades: much like how the Pullman Company took advantage of its Black employees during the 1920s, as late as 1966 the Missouri Pacific Railroad still classified its Black brakemen as “train porters” and refused to pay equal wages for equal work. Now, Black employees could file official complaints, and the EEOC charged Missouri Pacific with illegal discrimination.